Closed Door Meetings & A Tale of Two Papers

We subscribe to the Kent County News because that weekly knows how to covers its political beat, reporting on what is happening at town and county meetings and presenting it as it unfolds in the open sessions. Periodically when the elected officials hold closed doors meetings, the neighboring paper is quick to challenge that decision in editorials and through the legal system. Such detailed, careful reporting of what goes on in public meetings is a critical role newspapers play in helping to keep a balance in the political process and it is an important way editors add value to their product.

What has us writing about this subject this evening is the lead editorial in the Eastern Shore paper. It took the school board to task for bypassing the political process by failing to allow the public to observe its actions at several closed sessions. This is the kind of reporting we’ve come to expect from this excellent paper for its editors frequently take the political leadership to task for violating provisions of the Maryland Open Meetings Act.

But what have we had in Cecil County recently? There was the Cecil Whig piece saying that a county closed door meeting on the SPCA matter was appropriate. We challenged that assertion when the paper made it for we are sure the county has enough administrators and attorneys on the public payroll to help them make their own case. It would be a much more valuable contribution to good government if the newspapers would challenge these sorts of decisions, rather than defending them. They sure aren’t going to be able to bring home quality content if it is all done behind closed doors. In fact, we’re willing to bet that very few editors go out of their way to approve of closed door meetings. The more sunshine we have on the activities of government, the better it is for everyone. But apparently our local paper doesn’t see if that way, but they do in Kent County.

Note:  When it came time to consider renewing our subscription to the Whig, we discovered that the paper was changing it’s Internet business strategy.  They are now including free access to the web site for subscribers.  That’s a step in the right direction, but we suspect eventually they will have to make all of their content, plus lots more, available on the web.  On the very day that the New York Times decided there wasn’t enough web traffic for a paid subscription model for the nation’s daily, our local paper decided it would charge for access.  We’re sure there isn’t enough income generated by that approach to pay the cost associated with managing the web site.  It is fascinating how fast the models for advertising are moving away from print and papers need to get ahead of that curve if they are going to survive.

About these ads

5 responses to “Closed Door Meetings & A Tale of Two Papers

  1. Amen brother. You’re preachin’ to the choir at this IP.

  2. Pingback: Someone Noticed Compares Whig’s Attitude Toward Closed Door Meetings with Other Paper in Region « The Official Blog of Delegate Mike Smigiel

  3. I second the “emotion” :-)

  4. The Dickens You Say

    It was the best of journalism, it was the worst of journalism. Your “Tale of Two Papers” points out he vast difference between a newspaper whose editorial staff believes in the benefit open government (Kent County News) versus a paper whose editorial board apparently thinks it is O.K. for the peoples’ busineness to be conducted clandestinely. (Cecil Whig). As Someone Noticed pointed out newspapers should not go out of their way curry favor with politicians. For example, there is a character who lurks around ther Opinion page of theCecil Whig. This denizen of the deep is a spritual guru to certain politicans and is known as “The Bearded One.” He apparantly possesses substantial supernatural powers and has taught his followers how to walk on water. If you don’t believe me, just read one of his columns. The Bearded One also packs more spin than a Maytag dryer and readers of the Whig are well advised to steer clear of the cyclonic effect of his writing. No, Mr. Moderator, newspaers should not molly coddle our elected officials, especially those politicans who believe its acceptable to treat the poublic like a mushroom; that is to keep them in the dark and feed them crap.
    Now, I think I’ll have a maritini. Olive r Twist?

  5. The Dickens You Say:

    Think of the pressure involved at the national level when you’re dealing with powerful politicians, such as the president or members of Congress. It can be dificult to ask the questions that are needed to get to the basis of a complex story and to ask questions that challenge those in leadership, in order to acquire a balanced understanding. There is a tendency on the part of many in media to want to be too friendly with the subjects they are covering. Oh for the days of the likes of Bill Frank and others from the News Journal. Those guys provided a great service to the publishers for they’d stir things up real good on issues like civil rights, busing and much more in Delaware. They were deliverying a service to the public and to the publishers because people snapped up those newspapers. We’ll never see those times in small town papers for the publishers wouldn’t want such controversial reporting that seriously challenged the wisdom of the political leadership when we were coming through the Civil Rights, vietnam and such.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s